APPLICATION OF AI TOOLS BY BUSINESS EDUCATORS FOR PERSONAL DEVELOPMENT AND RESEARCH PRODUCTIVITY IN TERTIARY INSTITUTIONS

Sikiru Issa Nuhu, Ph.D, Israel Segun Ogundele Ph.D, Akinbode Sangodapo PhD, Zainab Temitope Abdullateef

Abstract


The rapid advancement of computing technologies has facilitated the implementation of AIED (Artificial Intelligence in Education) applications. This study examines the application of Artificial Intelligence (AI) tools by business educators and its impact on personal development and research productivity in tertiary institutions. Two purposes were raised from which two research questions formulated. The research employed a descriptive survey design, utilizing a structured e- questionnaire to gather data from business educators across six tertiary institutions offering business education in Kwara State Nigeria. The population consisted of 51 business educators, and the entire population was used for the study. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics (percentage and mean) to answer the research questions. The findings revealed that the use of AI tools influence research productivity among business educators to a moderate extent (mean=2.84; SD=0.80). The study confirmed that the use of AI tools influence research productivity among business educators to a moderate extent (mean=2.84; SD=0.80). Specifically, educators who frequently used AI tools reported enhanced professional skills, increased research efficiency, and higher quality of research outputs. It was concluded that the advancement of AI has ushered in a new era of computer-supported education, significantly transforming the landscape of teaching and learning. By integrating human intelligence into computer systems, AI has the potential to act as an intelligent tutor, tool, or tutee, facilitating decision-making and enhancing educational practices. It was recommended among others that There is a need for targeted professional development programs aimed at enhancing the understanding and use of AI tools among business educators in tertiary institutions. These programs should focus on practical applications of AI in personal development and research, ensuring educators are equipped with the necessary skills to integrate AI effectively into their work.

Keywords: Artificial Intelligence, Business Education, Research, Development, Productivity.


Full Text:

PDF

References


Arrieta, A. B., Díaz-Rodríguez, N., Del Ser, J., Bennetot, A., Tabik, S., Barbado, A., Garcia, S.,

Gil-Lopez, S., Molina, D., Benjamins, R., Chatila, R., & Herrera, F. (2020). Explainable artificial intelligence (XAI): Concepts, taxonomies, opportunities and challenges toward responsible AI. Information Fusion, 58, 82–115. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.inffus.2019.12.012.

Chatterjee, S., & Bhattacharjee, K. K. (2020). Adoption of Artificial Intelligence in Higher Education: a Quantitative Analysis Using Structural Equation Modelling. Forthcoming in Education and Information Technologies.

Chen, X., Zou, D., Xie, H., Cheng, G., & Liu, C. (2022). Two decades of artificial intelligence in education. Educational Technology & Society, 25(1), 28-47.

Dai, W., Lin, J., Jin, F., Li, T., Tsai, Y., Gasevic, D., & Chen, G. (2023). Can large language models provide feedback to students? A case study on ChatGPT. EdArVix Preprint. https://doi.org/10.35542/osf.io/hcgzj

Dai, C. S. Chai, P. Y. Lin (2023). Promoting students’ wellbeing by developing their readiness for the artificial intelligence age,” Sustainability, vol. 12, no. 16, pp. 1–1

Duan, Y., Edwards, J. S., & Dwivedi, Y. K. (2019). Artificial intelligence for decision making in

the era of Big Data–evolution, challenges, and research agenda. International Journal of Information Management, 48, 63–71

Essa, A. (2016). A possible future for next generation adaptive learning systems. Smart Learning Environments, 3(1). Article 16

Fenwick, T. (2018). Pondering purposes, propelling forwards,” Studies in Continuing Education, vol. 40, no. 3, pp. 367–380, 2018.

Flogie, A. & Aberˇsek, B. (2015). Transdisciplinary approach of science, technology, engineering and mathematics education,” Journal of Baltic Science Education, vol. 14, no. 6, pp. 779– 790.

Future of Life Institute (2023). Pause Giant AI Experiments: An Open Letter. https://futureoflife.org/openletter/pause-giant-ai-experiments/

Hart, S. A. (2016). Precision education initiative: Moving toward personalized education. Mind, Brain, and Education, 10(4), 209–211.

Horakova, T., Houska, M & Domeova, L. (2017). Classification of the educational texts styles with the methods of artificial intelligence,” Journal of Baltic Science Education, vol. 16, no. 3,

pp. 324–336, 2017

Hwang, G. J. (2014). Definition, framework, and research issues of smart learning environments-

a context-aware ubiquitous learning perspective. Smart Learning Environments, 1(1), 4.

Hwang, G. J., Wu, P. H., & Ke, H. R. (2020). An interactive concept map approach to supporting mobile learning activities for natural science courses. Computers & Education, 57(4), 2272–2280.

Ijaz, K., Bogdanovych, A., & Trescak, T. (2017). Virtual worlds vs books and videos in history education,” Interactive Learning Environments, vol. 25, no. 7, pp. 904–929, 2017

Kay, J. (2012). AI and education: Grand challenges. IEEE Intelligent Systems, 27(5), 66–69 Knight, S. J. G., & Littleton, K. (2015). Thinking, Interthinking, and Technological Tools. In:

Wegerif, Rupert; Li, Li and Kaufman, James C. eds. The Routledge International Handbook of Research on Teaching Thinking. Routledge International Handbooks of Education. Abingdon, New York: Routledge, pp. 467– 478

Lacity, M., & Willcocks, L. M. (2017). Robotic Process Automation and Risk Mitigation: :e Definitive Guide, SB Publishing, Ashford, UK.

Lathuiliere, S., Masse, B., Mesejo, P., & Horaud, R. (2019). Neural network-based reinforcement learning for audio-visual gaze control in human-robot interaction. Pattern Recognition Letters, 118, 61–71.

Lawler, R. W., & Rushby, N (2013). An interview with Robert Lawler. British Journal of Educational Technology, vol. 44, no. 1, pp. 20–30, 2013

Nguyen, A., Ngo, H.N., Hong, Y., Dang, B., & Nguyen, B.T. (2023). Ethical principles for artificial intelligence in education. Education and Information Technologies, 28, 4221 - 4241 . https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11316-w

Loeckx, J., (2016). Blurring boundaries in education: context and impact of MOOCs, :e International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 92– 121, 20.

Seldon, A. & Abidoye, O. (2018). Fourth Education Revolution, pp. 1–14, University of Buckingham Press, London, UK,

Thompson, K., Corrin, L., & Lodge, J. M. (2023). AI in tertiary education: progress on research and practice. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 39(5), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.9251

Topol, E. J. (2019). High-performance medicine: The convergence of human and artificial intelligence. Nature Medicine, 25(1), 44–56.

Umoru, T. A. (2015). Methodology of teaching Business Education Subjects. Reading material for Doctoral students. Kwara State University, Malete.

Van Seters, J. R., Ossevoort, M. A., Tramper, J., & Goedhart, M. J. (2012). The influence of student characteristics on the use of adaptive e-learning material. Computers & Education, 58, 942–952.

Xie, H., Chu, H.-C., Hwang, G.-J., & Wang, C., C. (2019). Trends and development in technology enhanced adaptive/personalized learning: A systematic review of journal publications from 2007 to 2017. Computers & Education, 140, 103599.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103599


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.